Guys,

bkw gave me some homework and now I have a few questions.  I notice that in switch-types.h there are all sorts of typedef struct statements that create a switch_ version of the corresponding apr_ type.  However, I’ve also noticed that scattered throughout the source that there are numerous occasions where the apr_ namespace is used even when there is a switch_ equivalent available.  Example: using apr_pool_t instead of switch_memory_pool_t in mod_openmrcp.c.

Questions:  Is it FS standard policy/best practices always to use the switch_ namespace?  Are there legitimate situations where one would prefer apr_ instead of switch_?

Thanks,

MC

P.S. – If there are cases where apr_ is used when there are switch_ equivalents, does that mean there is an impending codebase cleanup project to make everything consistent?