<div dir="ltr">Hello Michael,<div><br></div><div>The only reason is performance benefits, but i'm a little uncertain how much though.</div><div><br></div><div>/Allan</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Michael Jerris <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mike@jerris.com" target="_blank">mike@jerris.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word">Thats possibly a bug. Please file in jira. Is there a reason you want to use proxy mode? There are very few scenarios where proxy mode is at all useful.<span class=""><div><br><div><blockquote type="cite"><div>On Jun 22, 2016, at 10:18 AM, Allan Kristensen <<a href="mailto:ak@hejdu.dk" target="_blank">ak@hejdu.dk</a>> wrote:</div><br><div><div dir="ltr">Hello Michael,<div><br></div><div>Thank you very much, that seems to have solved the problem.<br><br></div><div>However when running FS in proxy mode (inbound-proxy-media=true) it still doesn't listen on the rtcp port. Would this be desired behavior?</div><div><br></div><div>Best regards,</div><div>/Allan</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Michael Jerris <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mike@jerris.com" target="_blank">mike@jerris.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word">upgrade to latest release.<div><br><div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div><div>On Jun 17, 2016, at 9:16 AM, Allan Kristensen <<a href="mailto:ak@hejdu.dk" target="_blank">ak@hejdu.dk</a>> wrote:</div><br></div></div><div><div><div><div dir="ltr">Hello,<div><br></div><div>Does Freeswitch need the rtcp attribute in the sdp to enable rtcp?</div><div><br></div><div>When connecting to asterisk (which does not include a rtcp attribute), Freeswitch does not start to listen on the rtcp port (rtp port +1).<br><br></div><div>When connecting to other Freeswitch servers, which have this attribute in the sdp everything works fine.</div><div><br></div><div>According to the RFC <span style="font-size:12.8px">3605</span> it should not be needed, unless it doesn't follow the parity rule (rtp port +1).</div><div><br></div><div>...Or is it just me?<br></div><div><br></div><div>Best regards,</div><div> Allan</div></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div></div></div></blockquote></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></span></div><br>_________________________________________________________________________<br>
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:<br>
<a href="mailto:consulting@freeswitch.org">consulting@freeswitch.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com</a><br>
<br>
Official FreeSWITCH Sites<br>
<a href="http://www.freeswitch.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.freeswitch.org</a><br>
<a href="http://confluence.freeswitch.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://confluence.freeswitch.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.cluecon.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.cluecon.com</a><br>
<br>
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org">FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users</a><br>
UNSUBSCRIBE:<a href="http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users</a><br>
<a href="http://www.freeswitch.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.freeswitch.org</a><br></blockquote></div><br></div>