Can someone explain why sip would be preferred in this scenario?  Is there any real reason?  <span></span><br><br>On Friday, April 8, 2016, Quan Huo Sheng &lt;<a href="mailto:quanhs@stee.stengg.com">quanhs@stee.stengg.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">





<div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1f497d">Hi;<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1f497d">I want to set up Webrtc Demo using freeswitch with media switching or media transcode. Setup is chrome (sip.js) -&gt;fs-&gt;chrome (sip.js), but end up with fail.
<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1f497d">Can you share your successful case using Webrtc + opus. (SIP preferred to Verto as signal).<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1f497d">Thanks<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1f497d">Smile<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Calibri&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1f497d"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:&quot;Tahoma&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:&quot;Tahoma&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;"> <a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,&#39;cvml&#39;,&#39;freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org&#39;);" target="_blank">freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org</a> [mailto:<a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,&#39;cvml&#39;,&#39;freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org&#39;);" target="_blank">freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Oleg Stolyar<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Friday, April 08, 2016 12:50 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> FreeSWITCH Users Help<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Freeswitch-users] OPUS and CPU load<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">In my tests OPUS transcoding seems to consume 5-6 times more CPU then G.711 or G.722.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Michael Jerris &lt;<a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,&#39;cvml&#39;,&#39;mike@jerris.com&#39;);" target="_blank">mike@jerris.com</a>&gt; wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I&#39;ve seen estimates that opus is up to twice as heavy as g729.  webrtc encryption adds some (although not huge) load on top of that.  20 opus sessions per cpu seems low, are these particularly slow processors or virtual processors?<br>
<br>
<br>
&gt; On Apr 7, 2016, at 12:25 PM, Agustí Ubalde &lt;<a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,&#39;cvml&#39;,&#39;aubalde@presenceco.com&#39;);" target="_blank">aubalde@presenceco.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Hi all,,<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; I have found that the CPU usage with users WebRTC + OPUS is high. With 2vCPUs, 10 users use 25% of CPU. Anyone know if this load is normal?<br>
<br>
<br>
_________________________________________________________________________<br>
Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:<br>
<a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,&#39;cvml&#39;,&#39;consulting@freeswitch.org&#39;);" target="_blank">consulting@freeswitch.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com" target="_blank">http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com</a><br>
<br>
Official FreeSWITCH Sites<br>
<a href="http://www.freeswitch.org" target="_blank">http://www.freeswitch.org</a><br>
<a href="http://confluence.freeswitch.org" target="_blank">http://confluence.freeswitch.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.cluecon.com" target="_blank">http://www.cluecon.com</a><br>
<br>
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list<br>
<a href="javascript:_e(%7B%7D,&#39;cvml&#39;,&#39;FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org&#39;);" target="_blank">FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users" target="_blank">http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users</a><br>
UNSUBSCRIBE:<a href="http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users" target="_blank">http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users</a><br>
<a href="http://www.freeswitch.org" target="_blank">http://www.freeswitch.org</a><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
<p><br>
[This e-mail is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the<br>
intended recipient, please kindly notify us immediately and delete the message<br>
from your system; please do not copy or use it for any purpose, nor disclose<br>
its contents to any other person. Thank you.]<br>
---ST Electronics Group---</p>

<p></p></div>

</blockquote>