<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Have not tested it lately, but likely still true, in regards to "I guess"... why not just try it and see for sure?<div class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Feb 16, 2016, at 2:15 PM, Abaci B <<a href="mailto:abaci64@gmail.com" class="">abaci64@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class="">I remember in the early days of FreeSWITCH it was recommended to turn off hyperthreading as it had a negative impact on FreeSWITCH performace, Can someone confirm if this has changed with newer processors or newer kernel, if hyperthreading boosts performance then I would guess that a 10 core xeon would give me at least as much performace as a 16 core AMD.</div><div class="">Thanks<br class=""></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br class=""><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Michael Jerris <span dir="ltr" class=""><<a href="mailto:mike@jerris.com" target="_blank" class="">mike@jerris.com</a>></span> wrote:<br class=""><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">You would have to test to see, most of my experience is a couple chip generations back now but bang for the buck was much better with intel then and we saw many more weird issues on AMD boxes.<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><span class=""></span><br class=""><br class="">On Sunday, February 14, 2016, Abaci B <<a href="mailto:abaci64@gmail.com" target="_blank" class="">abaci64@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br class=""><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class="">Hi all,</div><div class="">I know that in general Intel Xeon processors are recommended over AMD for FreeSWITCH, my question is if AMD is really bad or just not as good as Intel, I can get now a server with 4x AMD 6174 (48 Core total) for about the same price I would pay for a Dual Xeon 6 Core (12 core total), Should I go for the AMD which will give me 4x the amount of cores or stick to Xeon, my goal is to get the maximum amount of channels/calls (doing lua IVR with no transcoding) and conferencing.</div><div class="">Any help, feedback, benchmarks or personal experience would be appreciated</div><div class="">Thanks</div></div>
</blockquote>
</div></div></blockquote></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></div></body></html>