<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC '-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN'>
<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=utf-8">
<style>BODY{font:10pt Tahoma, Verdana, sans-serif}</style></head><body>
<DIV>There is a lot more info needed here... There are no problems with running FS on windows. I have had many workloads running on windows for years now, in production and in excess of 3000 channels. However I admit this is on the 1.2 stable branch. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Just as if we were trying to debug a problem on a linux box, the same thing applies to windows. Need details about the process running. For example what user was the process running as? Interactive or as a service? Is UAC enabled on he system? What roles and features are installed? How much Ram is on the system? Etc...?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Just like under linux, the same applies for windows. Do you have a process dump at the time of the exception? That should tell a whole lot more :)</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Other things that come to mind. Have you tried it on another windows box? A reference box with nothing else installed? How about on newer versions of windows server? Does the same problem exist on 2012 or 2012R2? </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Since you are running on a 64 bit OS, are you running the FS x64 build?</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>This like any other issuse can be solved with a little info and debugging.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>If you need some help with this, feel free to contact me off list.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>--Dave</DIV><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<HR>
<B>From:</B> bruce@sqls.net<BR><B>To:</B> FreeSWITCH Users Help [mailto:freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org]<BR><B>Sent:</B> Wed, 26 Mar 2014 07:09:02 -0700<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Freeswitch-users] UBUNTU VS WINDOWS<BR><BR>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Just curious... Is it possible to just switch over to using Linux for both of your FS installs? I doubt FS will ever run as well on Windows as it does under Linux. I believe it's mostly developed on Linux and the vast majority of it's users use it under Linux and so that's were it gets the most testing.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Generally, when running something (especially open source software) I like to find out what the developers are developing the software and testing the software on. From what I've read it's mainly CentOS or Debian. So, those might be the best choice to get the best performance and least problems with FS. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>------ Original Message ------</DIV>
<DIV>From: "Ryan Gholam" <<A href="mailto:ryangholam@gmail.com">ryangholam@gmail.com</A>></DIV>
<DIV>To: "FreeSWITCH Users Help" <<A href="mailto:freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org">freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org</A>></DIV>
<DIV>Sent: 3/26/2014 8:17:12 AM</DIV>
<DIV>Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] UBUNTU VS WINDOWS</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV id=662b647a74b14baca3cac3863d0a46b8>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=cite2 type="cite">
<DIV>Thank you for your reply ,<BR> probably the main issue is that i run 300 playback with 300 record in the same time on linux it works while in windows it doesn’t with the same code here and there , so freeswitch loaded in windows throws this error . Normal_Clearing and socket_error . <BR></DIV>
<DIV class=gmail_extra><BR><BR>
<DIV class=gmail_quote>On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Michael Jerris <SPAN><<A href="mailto:mike@jerris.com">mike@jerris.com</A>></SPAN> wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex" class=gmail_quote>Probably not without doing some work in the code. We have done quite a bit to optimize for linux, someone would have to do some deep analysis of any bottlenecks in windows and address them.<BR>
<DIV>
<DIV class=h5><BR>On Mar 26, 2014, at 5:19 AM, Ryan Gholam <<A href="mailto:ryangholam@gmail.com">ryangholam@gmail.com</A>> wrote:<BR><BR>> Hi ,<BR>><BR>><BR>> I have this problem that has been taking quite some time , I have 600 concurrent calls running on freeswitch in WINDOWS , and running on another pc (UBUNTU ) , i find that freeswitch on ubuntu is much more efficient than windows .<BR>><BR>> The basic error that i am getting on Windows when running it for 10 hours is : [CRIT] mod_event_socket.c 2618 Socket Error!<BR>><BR>> At Originate Result : NORMAL_CLEARING, which is due to Socket Error .<BR>><BR>> Is there some way i can have the same efficiency ?<BR><BR><BR></DIV></DIV>_________________________________________________________________________<BR>Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:<BR><A href="mailto:consulting@freeswitch.org">consulting@freeswitch.org</A><BR><A href="http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com/">http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com</A><BR><BR>FreeSWITCH-powered IP PBX: The CudaTel Communication Server<BR><A href="http://www.cudatel.com/">http://www.cudatel.com</A><BR><BR>Official FreeSWITCH Sites<BR><A href="http://www.freeswitch.org/">http://www.freeswitch.org</A><BR><A href="http://wiki.freeswitch.org/">http://wiki.freeswitch.org</A><BR><A href="http://www.cluecon.com/">http://www.cluecon.com</A><BR><BR>FreeSWITCH-users mailing list<BR><A href="mailto:FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org">FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org</A><BR><A href="http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users">http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users</A><BR>UNSUBSCRIBE:<A href="http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users">http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users</A><BR><A href="http://www.freeswitch.org/">http://www.freeswitch.org</A><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE>
<STYLE>
BLOCKQUOTE.cite {BORDER-LEFT:#cccccc 1px solid;PADDING-LEFT:10px;PADDING-RIGHT:0px;MARGIN-LEFT:5px;MARGIN-RIGHT:0px}
BLOCKQUOTE.cite2 {BORDER-LEFT:#cccccc 1px solid;MARGIN-TOP:3px;PADDING-LEFT:10px;PADDING-RIGHT:0px;MARGIN-LEFT:5px;MARGIN-RIGHT:0px;PADDING-TOP:0px}
.plain PRE {FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma;FONT-SIZE:12pt}
.plain TT {FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma;FONT-SIZE:12pt}
BODY {FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma;FONT-SIZE:12pt}
</STYLE>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></body></html>