<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=iso-8859-1"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">NO NEED TO SHOUT OVER IT!!!<div><br><div><div>On Aug 21, 2013, at 6:08 AM, Steven Ayre <<a href="mailto:steveayre@gmail.com">steveayre@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite">Without shouting file a jira... if that is intended behaviour a jira ticket could be commented and closed as such, and refered to from any duplicate tickets later. Or corrected.<span></span><div><br></div><div><br><br>On Wednesday, August 21, 2013, Andrew Cassidy wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; border-left-width: 1px; border-left-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); border-left-style: solid; padding-left: 1ex; position: static; z-index: auto; "><div dir="ltr">Hi all, I've just noticed a slightly unexpected (in my view) behavior when checking ACLs.<div><br></div>
<div>If you have an empty ACL with default="allow" it will always return false. Of course the workaround is to add a nonsense node into the list such as <a href="http://0.0.0.0/32" target="_blank">0.0.0.0/32</a> (either allow or deny) then the ACL works as expected.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Now, before people shout FILE A JIRA at me, the reason I haven't is because this behavior may be intended to prevent users accidentally leaving their FreeSWITCH installations open.</div><div><br></div>
<div>So my question is, is this the intended behaviour? If so, I'll add it to the wiki.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,<br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><b>Andrew Cassidy BSc (Hons) MBCS SSCA</b><div>Managing Director<div>
<div><img><br></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>