<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Jeff Bernhardt <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jeff@askcornerstone.net" target="_blank">jeff@askcornerstone.net</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div link="blue" vlink="purple" lang="EN-US">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt">As a follow up to this, I have another question! I got busy with some other things the last couple weeks and was revisiting this again. I realized that even though I thought I was registering to my external5090
profile, I was actually still registering to the internal one on 5060 (5060 is forwarded through my firewall to FS in addition to 5090). I discovered that this is because even though I put what I thought was the registration port 5090 in Jitsi (or Bria, or
Linphone, etc.), the softphone was still registering to 5060. Couldn’t figure out why, but then I put in the <external-address>:5090 in the outbound proxy settings, and it worked and confirmed registered to 5090 in fs_cli. Why do I have to put the external
ip in the proxy settings on my phone? Something set up wrong in my Freeswitch, my softphone(s)? Confused…</span></p></div></div></blockquote><div>Without knowing the topology we are equally confused. Is your phone behind the same NAT device as FreeSWITCH? What happens when you put <internal-fs-ip-addr>:5090 in the proxy settings of the phone?<br>
</div><div>-MC<br>
</div></div><br></div></div>