<div dir="ltr"><div style>In my opinion, TCP seems better than UDP as you know all the SIP packets are making to their destination. </div><br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Jeff Leung <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jleung@v10networks.ca" target="_blank">jleung@v10networks.ca</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div bgcolor="white" lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple"><div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">On a Linux system there is a limit of how many open TCP connections you have. </span></p>
</div></div></blockquote><div style>I never heard this before...where and how it this limit defined?</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div bgcolor="white" lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Unless you have a crazy amount of endpoints you have to serve, TCP probably isn’t really worth it in my opinion.<br>
</span></p></div></div></blockquote><div style>How many endpoints?</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div bgcolor="white" lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Also did I also mention that TCP connections don’t really fix NAT issues?</span></p></div></div>
</blockquote><div style> <br></div></div></div></div>