On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Roger Castaldo <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:roger.castaldo@gmail.com" target="_blank">roger.castaldo@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<p>This is just my two cents but could we not use snmp as a basis for something like this since it would allow monitoring eternally using ones own systems, or allow each FreeSWITCH server to monitor the other servers over snmp. At least I think it could be an option to explore anyways.</p>
</blockquote><div><br></div><div>SNMP is not intended as an HA solution. It is slow, and unwieldy to use. Fail over time using SNMP would be measured in minutes. We are going for sub-second fail over. SNMP is really only intended for external monitoring. SNMP also does not provide a solution for the vast majority of issues which an HA solution must cover.</div>
<div><br></div></div>