<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
building business around FS ;) Jokes aside - if somebody wants to<br>
configure FS in HA evironment I don't think it is much of an obstacle<br>
for him to configure Corosync as already he has to have some kind of<br>
DB failover as well, redundant switches, power, etc.<br></blockquote><div> <br clear="all"></div></div>I would like to see that statement put to the test. I would like to see someone attempt to put Corosync (or whatever existing solution) to use as the HA engine in a FS cluster. I suspect the amount of work involved is way more than has been suggested. If it really were that easy ("easy" being relative compared to what people perceive Eliot is doing) then I suspect it would have been done already. <br>
<br>In any case, Tony makes good points about furthering the discussion. If we can improve FreeSWITCH in any way to make this process more feasible (regardless of which solution is used) then that is a win for everyone. We will *briefly* discuss this subject on tomorrow's conference call so that interested parties can decide when and how they'd like to further this discussion.<br>
<br>-- <br>Michael S Collins<br>Twitter: @mercutioviz<br><a href="http://www.FreeSWITCH.org" target="_blank">http://www.FreeSWITCH.org</a><br><a href="http://www.ClueCon.com" target="_blank">http://www.ClueCon.com</a><br>
<a href="http://www.OSTAG.org" target="_blank">http://www.OSTAG.org</a><br><br>