<div dir="ltr">On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 9:59 PM, Robert Craig <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:craig.robert@hotmail.com" target="_blank">craig.robert@hotmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div><div dir="ltr">As far as I know, FS is running as root. Below are the permissions.<div><br></div><div><div><span style="font-size:12pt"><13>:ls -ld storage/fax/3150/inbox</span></div><div><br></div><div>drw-rw-rw- 2 root root 4096 Jan 18 10:28 storage/fax/3150/inbox</div>
<div><br></div><div>I've gone from the 'freeswitch' folder all the way into the inbox folder verifying the same permissions down the line. Should it include 'execute' permissions as well?</div></div></div>
</div></blockquote><div><br></div><div style>I'm a FreeSWITCH novice, but I've been using Unix systems since the early 1980's.</div><div style>Yes, the 'execute' permission needs to be set. The execute permission on a directory allows files (and directories) in that directory to be accessed. A directory with 'read', but not 'execute' permission allows you to see a list of files in that directory, but you can't access them or create new ones. It is very unusual to see a directory with the permissions you have shown.</div>
<div style><br></div><div style>-- </div><div style>Steve</div></div></div></div>