I was mentioning H.323 to a vendor of hardware gateways last week and he replied, "Does anybody still use H.323???" like I was from Mars or something.<br><br>With the increasing prevalence of SIP I'm betting that support for H.323 is not seen as a priority by most people, except those who use it of course. I agree that native support sounds preferable.<br>
<br>FWIW,<br>Bote<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 12:29 PM, curriegrad2004 <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:curriegrad2004@gmail.com">curriegrad2004@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Personally, a native H.323 solution for FreeSWITCH is better than<br>
having yate to act as a H323 and a SIP gateway.<br>
<br>
mod_opal has it's own problems for being finicky to build with<br>
specific combinations of OPAL and pt-lib. The same could be said for<br>
mod_H323 too. It's great to see people on the mailing list to ask<br>
questions about h323 because this module isn't in use by a lot of<br>
FreeSWITCHers out there.<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Peter Olsson<br>
<<a href="mailto:peter.olsson@visionutveckling.se">peter.olsson@visionutveckling.se</a>> wrote:<br>
> I'm using mod_h323. It works quite well - even though it's not 100% perfect, but the same goes for mod_opal...<br>
><br>
> I've used them both, but I actually think mod_h323 is a better and more stable choice.<br>
><br>
> /Peter<br>
><br></div></div></blockquote></div><br>