<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<br>
On 09/12/11 07:52, Ognjen Seslija wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAM21H-Ot6BeBONWdhFagDuxuWtHRG5ZCgn8dptZTTSfhys-pew@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<p>As Tony said, update. I have concurrent calls presence working
just fine nowadays.<br>
On 8 Dec 2011 22:38, "Tim St. Pierre" <<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:fs-list@communicatefreely.net">fs-list@communicatefreely.net</a>>
wrote:<br>
</p>
</blockquote>
<br>
On Snom, I still don't get flashing for a second call. Snom claim
this is as intended, which I think is silly. We get flashing when a
monitored extension is held, which is also confusing. Pressing the
BLF button steals the held call.<br>
<br>
On Grandstream, git of about 2 weeks ago, it seems to work perfectly
- again though we get flashing on hold and the held call can be
stolen.<br>
<br>
Polycom is also good, but yet again we have the flashing on hold
problem, but here the call cannot be stolen, which seems better.<br>
<br>
I'm very frustrated with the Snom behaviour and the fact they label
it as intended.<br>
<br>
Cheers<br>
<br>
Alex<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
This message is intended only for the addressee and may contain
confidential information. Unless you are that person, you may not
disclose its contents or use it in any way and are requested to delete
the message along with any attachments and notify us immediately.
"Transact" is operated by Integrated Financial Arrangements plc
Domain House, 5-7 Singer Street, London EC2A 4BQ
Tel: (020) 7608 4900 Fax: (020) 7608 5300
(Registered office: as above; Registered in England and Wales under number: 3727592)
Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority (entered on the FSA Register; number: 190856)</pre>
</body>
</html>