Yeah sox is great for command line and batch changes to volume levels<div><br></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="'courier new', monospace">// this command invocation outputs the maximum volume increase <name-of-input-sound-file> can go through without any distortion. The maximum volume increase possible is stored as a decimal in max_vol.txt</font></div>
<div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse; color: rgb(57, 57, 57); line-height: 16px; white-space: pre; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 3px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 3px; "><font class="Apple-style-span" face="'courier new', monospace">sox <name-of-input-sound-file> -n stat -v 2> max_vol.txt</font></span></div>
<div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse; color: rgb(57, 57, 57); font-family: 'courier new', monospace; line-height: 16px; white-space: pre; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 3px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 3px; ">// This command actually boosts the volume level of the input file. Output is stored in <name-of-output-sound-file></span></div>
<div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse; color: rgb(57, 57, 57); font-family: 'courier new', monospace; line-height: 16px; white-space: pre; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 3px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 3px; ">sox -v `cat max_vol.txt` <name-of-input-sound-file> <name-of-output-sound-file></span></div>
<div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:34 AM, Nandy Dagondon <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gcd@i.ph">gcd@i.ph</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
you can also run sox on a script to change the volume of the sound files by batch.
<br><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Jan Berger <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jan.berger@video24.no" target="_blank">jan.berger@video24.no</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Wavepad is free and will do bulk changes to sound files.<br>
<br>
Won't AGC solve this?<br>
<br>
Jan<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
From: <a href="mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org" target="_blank">freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org</a><br>
[mailto:<a href="mailto:freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org" target="_blank">freeswitch-users-bounces@lists.freeswitch.org</a>] On Behalf Of Bryan<br>
Smart<br>
Sent: 26. juni 2011 22:32<br>
To: <a href="mailto:freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org" target="_blank">freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org</a><br>
Subject: [Freeswitch-users] Proper prompt gain/level<br>
<div><div><br>
As part of creating prompts for my IVRs, I've tried to match the audio gain<br>
of my prompts with the gain of the stock English prompts. During this<br>
process, I noticed that the English Callie prompts are recorded extremely<br>
low (max gain around -16DB). I have the Cepstral Callie voice, and I must<br>
set the Cepstral volume to about 50% in order to match the gain of the<br>
English prompts. In conferences and other situations where prompts are<br>
played over conversations, the level of the prompts are obviously low.<br>
<br>
I can, of course, renormalize the gain of the prompts up to -10DB or more<br>
with a sound editor. However, I wonder if there is a better way to change<br>
the level of the prompts, or if there is a good reason for the prompts to be<br>
encoded at such a low level.<br>
<br>
I haven't considered all of the implications yet, but I'm fairly sure that<br>
encoding the prompts this quietly is not the best approach, even if it is<br>
desirable for the prompts to play quietly on a call. For each 6DB reduction<br>
in gain, there is a 50% reduction in perceived volume, and one less<br>
significant bit is used for storing the audio. In a 16-bit file, a maximum<br>
gain of -16 means that only the 14 least significant bits are actually used<br>
for encoding the audio. This results in a reduction in dynamic range, but<br>
the difference isn't really noticeable as long as the data remains 16-bit.<br>
The problem comes when the audio is converted to a different bit depth. For<br>
example, most quickie routines for converting 16-bit audio to 8-bit audio<br>
will simply chop off the 8 least significant bits. Therefore, when the<br>
prompts are converted to 8-bit audio for use by most of the narrow band<br>
codecs, the prompts are only using 6 bits of audio. If the volume of the<br>
channel is increased, then the<br>
6 bits are promoted, and the dithering errors at the bottom become louder.<br>
In the worst case, since these prompts are only encoded with 14 bits of<br>
actual data, and converting to an 8-bit channel will only leave 6 bits of<br>
actual data, boosting the gain of the prompts on an 8-bit channel to full<br>
loudness would result in the noise floor (the level of the dithering<br>
crackle) being about -18DB. That's almost as loud as the prompts themselves<br>
sound at the moment.<br>
<br>
Anyway, regardless of observations, is there a reason why the prompts must<br>
be recorded so quietly? If I'd like them louder (without increasing the gain<br>
of the entire channel), is there a way other than running them through a<br>
tool to renormalize their max levels?<br>
<br>
Bryan<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago<br>
<a href="http://www.cluecon.com" target="_blank">http://www.cluecon.com</a> 877-7-4ACLUE<br>
<br>
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org" target="_blank">FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users" target="_blank">http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users</a><br>
UNSUBSCRIBE:<a href="http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users" target="_blank">http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users</a><br>
<a href="http://www.freeswitch.org" target="_blank">http://www.freeswitch.org</a><br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago<br>
<a href="http://www.cluecon.com" target="_blank">http://www.cluecon.com</a> 877-7-4ACLUE<br>
<br>
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org" target="_blank">FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users" target="_blank">http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users</a><br>
UNSUBSCRIBE:<a href="http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users" target="_blank">http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users</a><br>
<a href="http://www.freeswitch.org" target="_blank">http://www.freeswitch.org</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>
</div></div><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Join us at ClueCon 2011, Aug 9-11, Chicago<br>
<a href="http://www.cluecon.com" target="_blank">http://www.cluecon.com</a> 877-7-4ACLUE<br>
<br>
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org">FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users" target="_blank">http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users</a><br>
UNSUBSCRIBE:<a href="http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users" target="_blank">http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users</a><br>
<a href="http://www.freeswitch.org" target="_blank">http://www.freeswitch.org</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Sidharth Kshatriya<br><a href="http://www.sidk.info">www.sidk.info</a><br><br>
</div>