<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Matteo <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mbrancaleoni@voismart.it">mbrancaleoni@voismart.it</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Hi,<br>
<br>
----- Messaggio originale -----<br>
<div class="im">><br>
> Any chance you can find the person who designed their SIP stack and<br>
> hit him with a ClueBat?<br>
<br>
</div>why? I think that can be correct, even on sip implementors someone expresses<br>
that if we receive 180 after 183 local ringing must be generated.<br>
And this is "more right" if before the 180 an update which tells us<br>
to stop the media is sent, like in this case.<br>
<br>
or I'm missing something?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I was just being glib. The simple fact of the matter is that if they are going to send a 183/sdp and then a 180 w/o sdp then you're simply going to have to figure out how to dance around it, or you're going to need to ignore that early media and just provide your own ringback to the calling party.</div>
<div><br></div><div>-MC</div></div>