Ok, thank you Rupa.<div>My doubt was: why FS try to add a nat port mapping when there is no nat?</div><div>But if this is only a log problem, then ok, I'll do a git pull.</div><div><br></div><div>Stephen<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Rupa Schomaker <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rupa@rupa.com">rupa@rupa.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
I lowered it to INFO<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Stephen Wilde <<a href="mailto:wstephen80@gmail.com">wstephen80@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> If I set log level to warning, I see in the log many row as:<br>
> [WARNING] switch_nat.c:589 NAT port mapping disabled<br>
> My freeswitch is running as: "./freeswitch -nonat"<br>
> because it has a public IP and all connected gateways have also a public IP.<br>
> To avoid this warning I have removed the parameter "-nonat" but if I do<br>
> "show nat_map" in fs_cli I see "0 total.".<br>
> I have always started Freeswitch with "-nonat", any advise to solve that?<br>
><br>
</div></div>--<br>
-Rupa<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org">FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users" target="_blank">http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users</a><br>
UNSUBSCRIBE:<a href="http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users" target="_blank">http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users</a><br>
<a href="http://www.freeswitch.org" target="_blank">http://www.freeswitch.org</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>