<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Giovanni Maruzzelli <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gmaruzz@gmail.com">gmaruzz@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Compiler options have nothing to do with libraries incompatibilities.<br>
Why don't you use the standard libraries given by your distro?<br>
Never heard someone had to compile ssl libs for FreeSWITCH.<br>
Also never heard someone used any compiler options on standard machines.<br>
FS is targeted toward 64bit OSes, most people use CentOS, Ubuntu and<br>
Debian. CentOS is by far the most used and the reference platform. On<br>
64bit.<br>
That said, if you're trying to optimize it for a PIII, an EPIA 5000 or<br>
an ARM, or whatever is not a standard server class machine, yes you<br>
better know how to optimize :).<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="verdana, sans-serif" color="#000099">Well 'you told me so' Giovanni ;)</font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="verdana, sans-serif" color="#000099"><br>
</font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="verdana, sans-serif" color="#000099">It's finally built! I deleted the entire source directory, did a brand new git clone, bootstrap and the whole process with NO switches, flags or options given to 'configure'</font></div>
<div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="verdana, sans-serif" color="#000099"><br></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="verdana, sans-serif" color="#000099">But the 'configure' etc did NOT take care of the fact that it's a 64-bit platform, proven by the following:</font></div>
<div><br></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000099"><div style="font-family: 'courier new', monospace; ">$ file ./.libs/freeswitch</div><div style="font-family: 'courier new', monospace; ">
./.libs/freeswitch: ELF 32-bit MSB executable, SPARC32PLUS, V8+ Required, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.18, not stripped</div>
<div style="font-family: 'courier new', monospace; "><br></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="verdana, sans-serif">Now I have heard from people in the debian-sparc forum that in the case of debian port, sparc32 is in fact faster than sparc64 and as a result the current userland is actually 32-bit. If that applies to FS built as 32-bit in this environment to be faster or comparable in performance to 64-bit, then I'm golden. Else, I guess I have no other choice as I can't figure out how to build it and get past the ssl problem I was having with all those m64 flags!</font></div>
</font></div></div></div>