<p>The timerfd stuff is experimental so play around and see.<br>
with 1000hz timer you don't need timerfd but it won't hurt.<br>
Its very dependant on the motherboard and cpu etc.<br>
</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Apr 8, 2011 11:46 AM, "A E [Gmail]" <<a href="mailto:all.eforums@gmail.com">all.eforums@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution">> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Anthony Minessale <<br>
> <a href="mailto:anthony.minessale@gmail.com">anthony.minessale@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>> <br>>> I think its relative to each kernel version.<br>>> The safe bet is to enable the 1000hz timer because 1ms is the least<br>
>> amount of time FS needs to sleep.<br>>> Sometimes when you have a kernel that runs even faster the performance<br>>> goes down due to the extra cycles.<br>>> All I can say is test everything.<br>
>><br>>> Try it both ways with 1000hz and however the default is and if you<br>>> support timerfd try that too.<br>>> param enable-softtimer-timerfd set to true in switch.conf.xml and/or<br>>> using mod_timer_fd and setting rtp_timer_name=timerfd in your sofia<br>
>> profile.<br>>><br>>><br>> Ok, Thanks Anthony. The default on my system was 250Hz. Have changed that<br>> and re-compiled the kernel. Will try out both and see what happens.<br>> <br>> BTW, do we need timerfd in conjunction with the 1000hz timer set in the<br>
> kernel or is it either/or? As in does it affect positively or negatively if<br>> we leave the kernel at 250Hz and enable timerfd as the timing source?<br>> <br>> Thanks<br></div>