<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Anthony Minessale <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:anthony.minessale@gmail.com">anthony.minessale@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
I think its relative to each kernel version.<br>
The safe bet is to enable the 1000hz timer because 1ms is the least<br>
amount of time FS needs to sleep.<br>
Sometimes when you have a kernel that runs even faster the performance<br>
goes down due to the extra cycles.<br>
All I can say is test everything.<br>
<br>
Try it both ways with 1000hz and however the default is and if you<br>
support timerfd try that too.<br>
param enable-softtimer-timerfd set to true in switch.conf.xml and/or<br>
using mod_timer_fd and setting rtp_timer_name=timerfd in your sofia<br>
profile.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="verdana, sans-serif" color="#000099">Ok, Thanks Anthony. The default on my system was 250Hz. Have changed that and re-compiled the kernel. Will try out both and see what happens.</font></div>
<div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="verdana, sans-serif" color="#000099"><br></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="verdana, sans-serif" color="#000099">BTW, do we need timerfd in conjunction with the 1000hz timer set in the kernel or is it either/or? As in does it affect positively or negatively if we leave the kernel at 250Hz and enable timerfd as the timing source?</font></div>
<div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="verdana, sans-serif" color="#000099"><br></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="verdana, sans-serif" color="#000099">Thanks</font></div></div></div>