<div> </div><div>On Wed, March 23, 2011 9:15 am, Michal Bielicki wrote:<br>> The problem is a bug in solaris perl development package that I haven't been doing<br>> anything about since I do not use perl for roughly a decade.<br>
> Its not the hash module, its the perl module.<br>> <br>> Am 23.03.2011 um 11:44 schrieb A E [Gmail]:<br>> <br>>> Hello FreeSwitchers!<br>>><br>>> Am attempting to compile the latest (off of Git) code for FS on Solaris 11 Express<br>
>> on an 64-Bit x86 machine. However, I'm running into the error that Bruce<br>>> McAllister has reported on 23rd Nov 2010. The bug is still sitting unresolved. So<br>>> I'm assuming there's a backdoor trick to fixing this OR that some other version of<br>
>> FS code doesn't have this issue. Could someone please let me on the secret on<br>>> which build compiles on x86 Solaris v10+ and/or what the backdoor trick to bypass<br>>> this is? Should I not compile the hash module where this bug seems to be<br>
>> originating from?</div><div> </div><div>I'm seeing the same error here with the perl module commented-out in modules.conf</div><div> </div><div>Please describe the workaround you are using to avoid the problem caused</div>
<div>by the perl module.</div><div> </div><div>thanks</div><div>-kim</div><div> </div>