<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Steve Underwood <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:steveu@coppice.org">steveu@coppice.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
I'm not clear how you can get a PBX SIP CONNECT approved. A lot of the<br>
document comes down to how you configure and use the system. Obviously,<br>
a product could present a roadblock that prevents SIP CONNECT compliance<br>
in a working setup, but I doubt that many products would do that.<br>
<br>
Characterising the SIP forum as a who's who of retarded SIP providers<br>
and PBXes is a little unfair. Practically everyone in the VoIP business<br>
is in that list. Capability certainly doesn't look like a prerequisite,<br>
though. :-\<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Hehe, true enough. Perhaps I was a little harsh. Still, you are quite right about the compliance test being incredibly subjective and capability not being a prerequisite. Sonus and ShoreTel are not exactly known for their SIP interop features.</div>
<div><br></div><div>-MC</div><div><br></div></div>