<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Kristian Kielhofner <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kris@kriskinc.com">kris@kriskinc.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
More scaremonger tactics from paper authors and journalists...<br>
<br>
This is for variable bitrate codecs only. Weaknesses in encryption<br>
for non-padded VBR codecs have been known for some time.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Agreed. VBR is, by definition, giving away extra information, and it's been know for a long time to do this. I'd like to see what they got out of non-VBR encrypted streams. Still, I'm gonna check this out to see if there's anything useful underneath the hair-on-fire claims.</div>
<div><br></div><div>-MC</div></div>