I was talking more about the FS module that I won't name that's based on IPP, not IPP itself.<br><br>-Steve<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 31 January 2011 15:54, Anton VG <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:anton.vazir@gmail.com">anton.vazir@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">IPP has a fairly good performance, at least on asterisk it performs<br>
as good as proprietary one, works perfectly fine, has no stability<br>
problems, and I highly doubt that FS situation differs, unless someone<br>
can prove it by posting real performance test numbers.<br>
<br>
2011/1/31 Steven Ayre <<a href="mailto:steveayre@gmail.com">steveayre@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5">> The price is set by the patent holders, there's not much that can be done<br>
> about that.<br>
><br>
> If you want to evaluate the g729 transcoding performance you *must* test<br>
> with the one you plan to recommend - the mod_com_g729, mod_sangoma_codec and<br>
> ipp g729 codecs have very difference performance characteristics. It is<br>
> pointless to evaluate one and then recommend another.<br>
><br>
> - mod_com_g729 is the official $10/channel license. It has good performance.<br>
> To evaluate it you should try it for yourself.<br>
> - The unofficial illegal FS module based ipp g729 which I shall not name has<br>
> stability problems and uses far more CPU than mod_com_g729. Do not use it.<br>
> - mod_sangoma_codec uses almost no CPU, but you do have to purchase a<br>
> transcoding card.<br>
><br>
> -Steve<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> On 31 January 2011 12:44, Gustavo Espeche <<a href="mailto:gustavo.espeche@upper-soft.com">gustavo.espeche@upper-soft.com</a>><br>
> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> I just need test the performance of trans-coding before to recommend to<br>
>> may customer what server it need and buy the codec, because of then i<br>
>> need testing in my lab how much cpu and memory require the trans-coding<br>
>> in freeswitch for g729.<br>
>> And searching i found the open-g729/g723 for asterisk.<br>
>> I relay don't wish to start a discussion about the g729 license i read<br>
>> and understated it. But i think that the license price per channel is to<br>
>> hight taking care that this codec has more than 10 years but the way<br>
>> this is only my opinion.<br>
>><br>
>> Best Regards.<br>
>> Gustavo Espeche<br>
>> <a href="http://www.easyipcall.com" target="_blank">www.easyipcall.com</a><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On Sat, 2011-01-29 at 17:27 -0600, Rupa Schomaker wrote:<br>
>> > How do you intend to pay the license fee?<br>
>> ><br>
>> > On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Gustavo Espeche<br>
>> > <<a href="mailto:gustavo.espeche@upper-soft.com">gustavo.espeche@upper-soft.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>> > > Hello,<br>
>> > > some one can compile open g729 to work with freeswitch?<br>
>> > > <a href="http://www.readytechnology.co.uk/open/ipp-codecs-g729-g723.1/" target="_blank">http://www.readytechnology.co.uk/open/ipp-codecs-g729-g723.1/</a><br>
>> > ><br>
>> > > i appreciate a lot if some one has some experience in it.<br>
>> > > Best Regards.<br>
>> > ><br>
>> > > Gustavo Espeche<br>
>> > > <a href="http://www.easyipcall.com" target="_blank">www.easyipcall.com</a><br>
>> > ><br>
>> > ><br>
>> > ><br>
>> > ><br>
>> > ><br>
>> > > _______________________________________________<br>
>> > > FreeSWITCH-users mailing list<br>
>> > > <a href="mailto:FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org">FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org</a><br>
>> > > <a href="http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users" target="_blank">http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users</a><br>
>> > ><br>
>> > > UNSUBSCRIBE:<a href="http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users" target="_blank">http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users</a><br>
>> > > <a href="http://www.freeswitch.org" target="_blank">http://www.freeswitch.org</a><br>
>> > ><br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>> ><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> _______________________________________________<br>
>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org">FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org</a><br>
>> <a href="http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users" target="_blank">http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users</a><br>
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:<a href="http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users" target="_blank">http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users</a><br>
>> <a href="http://www.freeswitch.org" target="_blank">http://www.freeswitch.org</a><br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org">FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users" target="_blank">http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users</a><br>
> UNSUBSCRIBE:<a href="http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users" target="_blank">http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users</a><br>
> <a href="http://www.freeswitch.org" target="_blank">http://www.freeswitch.org</a><br>
><br>
><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
FreeSWITCH-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org">FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users" target="_blank">http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users</a><br>
UNSUBSCRIBE:<a href="http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users" target="_blank">http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users</a><br>
<a href="http://www.freeswitch.org" target="_blank">http://www.freeswitch.org</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>