<snip><br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
You wrote in your reply to Woody: "Do you hear yourself btw?" I can ask<br>
you the same question: Do you hear yourself? You act as if some subjects<br>
are taboo in this list.<br></blockquote><div><br>Taboos aren't really the issue. Spending valuable time and energy in unfruitful debates is an issue. <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im"><br>
> If you decide to reply again, please limit the length of your post.<br>
><br>
><br>
</div>Now it is the size of my posts that troubles you? I've seen longer posts<br>
in the list and you didn't complain.<br></blockquote><div>Brevity is the essence of communication - I highly recommend it.<br> <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
Perhaps you should add a size restriction directive in the mailing list<br>
policy, along with a "no performance questions allowed" directive. That<br>
should clear things up significantly.<br></blockquote><div>Would you be willing just to let the subject go? I think everyone is tired of this thread. <br><br></div></div>-MC<br><br>P.S. - Just a clarification: Using SIPp is a "fake" test to do 200/400/600/xxx calls per second. Getting thousands of actual humans making actual calls is a "real" test. In other words, since SIPp can only do so much its test results are of limited value in the real world.<br>