<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><meta charset="utf-8"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Times; font-size: 16px; "><pre style="font-size: 1em; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; ">Expiration 5/31/01 </pre></span><div><br></div><div>An actual RFC as opposed to a 10 year old now expired draft?</div><div><br></div><div>Mike</div><div><br></div><div><div>On Aug 17, 2010, at 2:25 PM, SP wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div><a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sip-privacy-00">http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sip-privacy-00</a><br><br>5.2 Anonymity Header Field Definition<br>blah blah blah..."If privacy is requested, it MUST be one or more of<br>"full", "uri",<br> "name", or "ipaddr"."<br><br><br>On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 17:52, Michael Jerris <mike@jerris.com> wrote:<br><blockquote type="cite">is there a specification which defines this "uri" value?<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">Mike<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">On Jul 22, 2010, at 2:36 PM, Sergey Okhapkin wrote:<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">FS doesn't recognize "uri" value of privacy tag, the recognized values are<br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">"yes", "full", "name" and "number". Any other value is interpreted as "off".<br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">See sofia.c, lines around 6660.<br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">On Thursday 22 July 2010, mike.burlingame wrote:<br></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">Ok so I am still kinda lost in trying to figure this one out here are the<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">two headers that I am looking at - basically someone sends an invite to FS<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">that ask's FS via RPID to hide the caller id info from downstream gateways<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">so the A-LEG is the invite going to FS - FS takes the invite and spits out<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">the B-LEG to go downstream HOWEVER FS does not copy the parameters<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">correctly as you can see in the initial invite A-LEG requested in the RPID<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">to be privacy=uri however on the B-LEG side FS set the RPID to privacy=off<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">in turn telling gateways downstream to display the CID info.<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">A-LEG<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">Remote-Party-ID: <sip:NUMBER@DOMAIN>;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=uri<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">B-LEG<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">Remote-Party-ID: "NAME"<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><sip:NUMBER@IPADDRESS>;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">On Jul 22, 2010, at 09:35 AM, Michael Collins <msc@freeswitch.org> wrote:<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 4:18 PM, mike.burlingame <mike.burlingame@me.com><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">wrote: yeah the variable I need from the A-LEG is privacy=uri the B-LEG of<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">FS by default is putting privacy=off - so I would guess the variable that<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">needs to be exported would be the privacy= correct?<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">So the next question I would have is how do I export that that from the<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">A-LEG to the B-LEG - I would have though FS would be Data in Data out so<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">no need to change the RPID request from the original A-LEG? Is the<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">variable simply named "privacy"? If so just use the export app before the<br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite"><blockquote type="cite">bridge: <action application="export" data="privacy=${privacy}"/><br></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">_______________________________________________<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">FreeSWITCH-users mailing list<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">http://www.freeswitch.org<br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><br><br><br>-- <br>Shannon<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>FreeSWITCH-users mailing list<br>FreeSWITCH-users@lists.freeswitch.org<br>http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users<br>UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users<br>http://www.freeswitch.org<br></div></blockquote></div><br></body></html>