<p>That's not very useful you need a full report with extended checking.</p>
<p><blockquote type="cite">On Apr 18, 2010 7:34 AM, "Sergey Okhapkin" <<a href="mailto:sos@sokhapkin.dyndns.org">sos@sokhapkin.dyndns.org</a>> wrote:<br><br>According to valgrind there are no big leaks.<br>
<br>
==12476== LEAK SUMMARY:<br>
==12476== definitely lost: 146,309 bytes in 189 blocks.<br>
==12476== indirectly lost: 176 bytes in 12 blocks.<br>
==12476== possibly lost: 12,336 bytes in 18 blocks.<br>
==12476== still reachable: 1,077,431 bytes in 550 blocks.<br>
==12476== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks.<br>
<p><font color="#500050"><br><br><br>On Saturday 17 April 2010, Michael Jerris wrote:<br>> That is a completely incorrect statement. Usi...</font></p></blockquote></p>