<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=windows-1252" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.18876">
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Hi,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>I searched some articles of FS in a cluster
environment</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>but there are some unclear writes :</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>in <A
href="http://www.technoclicks.com/article-2545.php">http://www.technoclicks.com/article-2545.php</A> from
2006 it says</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV>"Minessale says FreeSwitch won't be bounded by those same problems. The
software is designed to run on a cluster of an unlimited number of servers
though realistically that will be gated by the capacity of the network. Early
tests on a single server showed simultaneous calls on a Pentium server running
at . GHz. The server completed calls per second with bursts to calls per
second."</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>and this thread from 2008</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2><A
href="http://www.mail-archive.com/freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org/msg05258.html">http://www.mail-archive.com/freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org/msg05258.html</A></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>that describes contradiction of how to manage
clustering.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>so is FS really be built as cluster to expand call capacity ?
or is it be clustered by the fact that only serveral FS share a DB
?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Regards</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>F</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>