<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:verdana, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:10pt"><div>One thing that I forgot to mention, these 2 FreeSWITCH servers are getting calls with load balancing from another switch. Thus, the traffic type are pretty much identical and both FSs have exactly the same on configuration. Any suggestion would be appreciated. Thank you.</div><div style="font-family:verdana, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:10pt"><br><div style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><font size="2" face="Tahoma"><hr size="1"><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">From:</span></b> DJB <djbinter@yahoo.com><br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> FREESWITCH-USERS MAILING LIST <freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org><br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Sun, December 6, 2009 5:17:14 PM<br><b><span
style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> [Freeswitch-users] Question regarding running FreeSWITCH with high priority enabled.<br></font><br><div style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt;"><div><div>I have 2 identical Dell PowerEdge 1950 servers running FreeSWITCH Version 1.0.4 (exported) with only one thing difference which is the first one is running with -hp enabled; however, I have noticed that the one with -hp option consumed double in memory usage than the other one. </div><div><br></div><div>I wonder whether anyone can explain why. Thank you.</div><div><br></div><div>Please see below:</div><div><br></div><div>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</div><div>top - 01:01:42 up 53 days, 2:45, 1 user, load average: 0.22, 0.28, 0.29</div><div>Tasks: 143 total, 1 running, 142 sleeping, 0 stopped,
0 zombie</div><div>Cpu(s): 0.9%us, 0.2%sy,
0.0%ni, 96.4%id, 2.5%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st</div><div>Mem: 8174164k total, 7550092k used, 624072k free, 187568k buffers</div><div>Swap: 10223608k total, 0k used, 10223608k free, 5417524k cached</div><div><br></div><div> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND </div><div>30750 root -2 -10 1823m 1.5g 20m S 8.6 19.8 1153:40 freeswitch</div><div><br></div><div>4418 session(s) 14/100</div><div><br></div><div>root 30750 2.1 <b><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#FF0000">19.9</font></b> 1879252 1634300
? S<Ll Oct30 1153:50 /usr/local/freeswitch/bin/freeswitch -nc -hp</div><div><br></div><div>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</div><div>top - 01:01:58 up 53 days, 2:45, 1 user, load average: 0.43, 0.51, 0.49</div><div>Tasks: 143 total, 1 running, 142 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie</div><div>Cpu(s): 0.9%us, 0.3%sy, 0.0%ni, 96.4%id, 2.4%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st</div><div>Mem: 8174164k total, 6751260k used, 1422904k free, 203948k buffers</div><div>Swap: 10223608k total, 0k used, 10223608k free, 5432632k cached</div><div><br></div><div> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
</div><div> 7147 root 15 0 1961m 755m 5164 S 9.0 9.5 1452:26 freeswitch </div><div><br></div><div>4478 session(s) 14/100</div><div><br></div><div>root 7147 1.9 <b><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#FF0000">9.4</font></b> 2009392 774848 ? Sl Oct15 1452:37 /usr/local/freeswitch/bin/freeswitch -nc</div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div><div style=""></div>
</div><br>
</div></div><div style="position:fixed"></div>
<!-- cg2.c1.mail.mud.yahoo.com compressed/chunked Wed Dec 2 09:01:50 PST 2009 -->
</div><br>
</body></html>