<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:05 PM, "Even André Fiskvik" <<a href="mailto:grevenx@me.com">grevenx@me.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
From: "Even André Fiskvik" <<a href="mailto:grevenx@me.com">grevenx@me.com</a>><br>To: <a href="mailto:freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org">freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org</a><br>Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 22:52:13 +0200<br>
Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] Load-Balance FreeSWITCH with Ultramonkey<br><div style="word-wrap:break-word">I have been working with a similar setup myself, but for some reason I ended up ditching the<div>UltraMonkey setup because I just couldn't get it to work right.</div>
<div><br></div><div>It's been quite a while since my effort, so I don't remember what the exact issue was.</div><div>I got registrations to work, but had some other sip-dialog issues.</div><div><br></div><div>We have since then changed over to running OpenSIPs as a loadbalancer in front of </div>
<div>multiple FreeSWITCH instances. This setup is still in testing, but seemlingy works fine</div><div>(and if it doesn't, it's my own fault for writing a bad opensips config).</div><div><br></div><div>After we have done some more testing I can create a wiki-page with config details.</div>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Best regards,</div><div>Even André</div><div><br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Thanks, Even, that would be great! I might have to give up on the ultramonkey solution, since I can't find anyone who has made it work. It's too bad, because it would fit well with the rest of our architecture.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Mike van Lammeren</div></div>