<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Gabriel Gunderson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gabe@gundy.org">gabe@gundy.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:44 PM, Seven Du <<a href="mailto:dujinfang@gmail.com">dujinfang@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> It not possible to use 0.0.0.0 for on profile. however, you can create more<br>
> sip profiles for each of your interfaces. Search freeswitch-users archievs<br>
> then you will find similar topics.<br>
<br>
</div>It sure would be nice to be able to provide a list of IPs in one<br>
profile. Seems like I run into that need often. Instead, I end up<br>
making two profiles that are mostly the same.<br>
<br>
Is there a reason why this is the way it is?<br></blockquote><div><br>A SIP profile is a user agent. By design it services exactly one IP/Port combo. If you are finding that you need to have multiple IP's or ports in a single SIP profile then that suggests to me that you might be trying to use the wrong tool for the job. What are the scenarios where you feel you need a single profile to handle multiple IP addresses? My guess is that bkw and the gang will have suggestions for an elegant solution that will fit your needs.<br>
<br>-MC<br><br></div></div>