<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div>Hi Everyone,</div><div><br></div><div>I'm working on a PBX project for the <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&ct=res&cd=1&url=http%253A%252F%252Fwww.marvell.com%252Fproducts%252Fembedded_processors%252Fdeveloper%252Fkirkwood%252Fsheevaplug.jsp&ei=EOOOSo6ILcyOtgeNruTOBA&usg=AFQjCNFREhfy_erj5irBWk8XFUjkQOP-aw&sig2=pAHYlI15IbZ5Kcw0n-nIvA">Sheevaplug</a> ARM based computer, with the following specs: CPU 1.2 GHz, 512MB DDR2, no FPU.</div><div>So far I've found a big difference between Freeswitch and Asterisk performance times.</div><div>This is a comparison of the time it takes them to perform different actions:</div><div><br></div><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;">startup Freeswitch:<span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>3 min.<br>startup Asterisk:<span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>2 sec.<br><br>call extension Freeswitch:<span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>6 sec.<br>call extension Asterisk:<span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>0 sec.<br><br></blockquote><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;">shutdown Freeswitch:<span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>6.5 sec</blockquote><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;">shutdown Asterisk:<span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>0 sec.</blockquote><blockquote class="webkit-indent-blockquote" style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;"><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"></span><br>reload config Freeswitch: <span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>1 sec.<br>reload config Asterisk:<span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"> </span>1 sec.</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Both were built from sources natively (no cross-compiling), and they use the default startup configurations.</div><div>I have managed to lower the Freeswitch times by disabling most of the modules and recompiling, but it is still far away from Asterisk (i.e. FS startup time 2.5 min).</div><div><br></div><div>1. Is there any way to further improve Freeswitch performance for the ARM architecture?</div><div>2. Can this be related to the lack of a FPU (the Sheevalug emulates the floating point operations).</div><div>3. On the startup I see this error repeated many times: [ERR] switch_core_sqldb.c:95 SQL ERR [database is locked]. Can this be related?</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks,</div><div>Rogelio Perez</div><div><br></div></body></html>