<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">I think sticking with standard WAMP is preferable. What is the advantage to creating yet another installer over the one that we have already done and maintained?<div><br></div><div>Mike<div><br><div><div>On Aug 16, 2009, at 6:02 PM, Meftah Tayeb wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"> <div bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> hello<br> i'm rewriting this executable file in MSI format<br> i can use:<br> <ul> <li>MakeMSI</li> <li>WIX (Windows installer XML)</li> </ul> what you like?<br> WIX is open source, but MakeMSI i'm not sur<br> for web server, i'm replacing WAMP with a great web server called uniform server<br> this server have a conventional Unix Path configuration, for example, web files can by stored in /www/ and apache is in /usr/local/apache2<br> this facilitate the deploiment of applications<br> any suggestion?<br> thanks<br> Meftah Tayeb<br> Carlos Talbot wrote: <blockquote cite="mid:5800526b0908161135o39e64592vd34d9ac280e2b054@mail.gmail.com" type="cite"> <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://files.freeswitch.org/windows_installer/freeswitch-1.0.4.exe">http://files.freeswitch.org/windows_installer/freeswitch-1.0.4.exe</a><br> <br> </blockquote></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div></body></html>