64bit is better as well correct?<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Brian West <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:brian@freeswitch.org">brian@freeswitch.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
CentOS 5.3<br>
<br>
/b<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
On Jul 6, 2009, at 5:53 PM, Ron McCarthy wrote:<br>
<br>
> Hey list,<br>
><br>
> We are running FS on FreeBSD 7.2 right now and cannot get it to push<br>
> over 48 CPS on a Dual core Xeon (2.4 ghz), we start running into<br>
> issues, max concurrent calls is around 500 as well. Asterisk can do<br>
> this so I would FS could out perform this! We run into major PDD<br>
> issues more then anything, where FS takes 10+ seconds to respond to<br>
> a invite, it's very weird and bad.<br>
><br>
> I have seen some issues with FreeBSD and FS so id like to try a<br>
> different OS and see what our results are. What does everyone<br>
> recommend for just raw performance and speed? I use to always run<br>
> Slackware until we moved everything over to FreeBSD, would that be a<br>
> good choice again?<br>
><br>
> Thanks<br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div>_______________________________________________<br>
Freeswitch-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org">Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users" target="_blank">http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users</a><br>
UNSUBSCRIBE:<a href="http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users" target="_blank">http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users</a><br>
<a href="http://www.freeswitch.org" target="_blank">http://www.freeswitch.org</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>