Ok Thanks Mike.<div><br></div><div>I hope in asterisk it is not there. I was trying some couple of things, </div><div><br></div><div>1. when I use Java servlet to dial a call thru asterisk using manager interface it slows down.</div>
<div><br></div><div>2. when I use the same Java servlet with Freeswitch I feel the speed and usage in the tomcat. Its bit faster for simultaneous call. whereas in Asterisk I am not able to see the speed.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Michael Jerris <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mike@jerris.com">mike@jerris.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
apr is used primarily for portability and utility, not performance.<br>
It is used heavily throughout the entire codebase in the core and all<br>
modules (via our abstraction layer).<br>
<div class="im"><br>
On May 28, 2009, at 10:14 AM, Gopalakrishnan A.N wrote:<br>
<br>
> Hi,<br>
><br>
> I saw the apache portable runtime is included in freeswitch. So<br>
> far I understand that using APR will give good performance. Am I<br>
> correct? or it has been used for some other scenarios like even<br>
> socket or dialplan?<br>
<br>
<br>
</div>_______________________________________________<br>
Freeswitch-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org">Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users" target="_blank">http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users</a><br>
UNSUBSCRIBE:<a href="http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users" target="_blank">http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users</a><br>
<a href="http://www.freeswitch.org" target="_blank">http://www.freeswitch.org</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Thank you with regards,<br>Gopal,<br><br>
</div>