<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">Update on this... the latest of anything to speak of in the standards process is that they are killing dtmf-relay. The last draft on it was:<div><br></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: 'Lucida Grande'; font-size: 10px; "><a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kaplan-sipping-dtmf-package-00" title="http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kaplan-sipping-dtmf-package-00" style="word-wrap: break-word; ">http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kaplan-sipping-dtmf-package-00</a></span></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#404040" face="'Lucida Grande'" size="2"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 10px;"><br></span></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#404040" face="'Lucida Grande'" size="2"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 10px;">Which says snom is sending it right. We will continue to accept both ways but need to think a bit about how we send. Should we match the draft or the cisco way (cisco by the way was on record saying that info dtmf-relay should die in favor of new specs such as kpml).</span></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#404040" face="'Lucida Grande'" size="2"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 10px;"><br></span></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#404040" face="'Lucida Grande'" size="2"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 10px;">If anyone wants a good read of what the ietf has standardized in place of info based dtmf, see <a href="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4730" title="http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4730" style="word-wrap: break-word; ">http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4730</a></span></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#404040" face="'Lucida Grande'" size="2"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 10px;"><br></span></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#404040" face="'Lucida Grande'" size="2"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 10px;">Mike</span></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#404040" face="'Lucida Grande'" size="2"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 10px;"><br></span></font><div><div>On Jan 8, 2009, at 6:38 PM, Brian West wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><div>Snom has already responded to my issue and are going to be providing <br>me a firmware for testing this tomorrow.. its still going to default <br>to the WRONG way.. but has a toggle to turn it to the right way.<br><br>/b<br><br>On Jan 8, 2009, at 3:23 PM, Kristian Kielhofner wrote:<br><br><blockquote type="cite"><br></blockquote><blockquote type="cite">Yes, it should use the decimal encoding from the table you mentioned.<br></blockquote><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Freeswitch-users mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org">Freeswitch-users@lists.freeswitch.org</a><br>http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users<br>UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users<br>http://www.freeswitch.org<br></div></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>