[Freeswitch-users] One-way audio but not video on 10.4

Thu Aug 27 19:51:16 UTC 2020

If client still isn’t putting in non rfc1918 candidates in audio you need to figure out why that is first.

> On Aug 26, 2020, at 7:17 PM, David P <davidswalkabout at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I've introduced Twilio STUN and TURN to our iceServers since then. All have the same network cost in the SDP and FSv10.4 chooses a host. Verto reports the remote stream arrived but getStats shows zero audio bytes in or out, and it's silent to our user.  I applied a display filter using our Freeswitch's public IP ip.src == 52.xx.yy.zz or ip.dst == ip.src == 52.xx.yy.zz and in addition to TLS I see some TCP ACKs from our user's 10.0.0.189 but I don't know what else to look for.
> 
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Mike Jerris <mike at freeswitch.org <mailto:mike at freeswitch.org>>
> To: FreeSWITCH Users Help <freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org <mailto:freeswitch-users at lists.freeswitch.org>>
> Cc: 
> Bcc: 
> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:19:56 -0400
> Subject: Re: [Freeswitch-users] One-way audio but not video on 10.4
>  
> Configure stun in your client so you get proper candidates that are reachable.
> 
>> On Aug 19, 2020, at 6:18 PM, David P <davidswalkabout at gmail.com <mailto:davidswalkabout at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Yesterday I had a verto call in which the <video> contained a remote echo (which is how we configure it) but there was no audio out nor in (confirmed by getStats showing zero audio bytes out or in).
>> 
>> I was using:
>> FreeSWITCH Version 1.10.4-release+git~20200805T110119Z~133fc2c870~64bit (git 133fc2c 2020-08-05 11:01:19Z 64bit)
>> from Chrome84/Win10
>> 
>> I noticed the video candidates included a relay but the audio ones didn't:
>> 
>> f6e23797-4ad2-b761-2a6d-97846c122d7e m=audio 62058 UDP/TLS/RTP/SAVPF 111 103 104 9 0 8 106 105 13 110 112 113 126
>> f6e23797-4ad2-b761-2a6d-97846c122d7e c=IN IP4 192.168.208.1
>> f6e23797-4ad2-b761-2a6d-97846c122d7e a=rtcp:9 IN IP4 0.0.0.0
>> f6e23797-4ad2-b761-2a6d-97846c122d7e a=candidate:1252570982 1 udp 2122260223 192.168.208.1 62058 typ host generation 0 network-id 1
>> f6e23797-4ad2-b761-2a6d-97846c122d7e a=candidate:854729925 1 udp 2122194687 172.20.4.169 62059 typ host generation 0 network-id 2 network-cost 10
>> f6e23797-4ad2-b761-2a6d-97846c122d7e a=candidate:69946262 1 tcp 1518280447 192.168.208.1 9 typ host tcptype active generation 0 network-id 1
>> f6e23797-4ad2-b761-2a6d-97846c122d7e a=candidate:2087835701 1 tcp 1518214911 172.20.4.169 9 typ host tcptype active generation 0 network-id 2 network-cost 10
>> 
>> f6e23797-4ad2-b761-2a6d-97846c122d7e m=video 13143 UDP/TLS/RTP/SAVPF 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 122 127 121 125 107 108 109 124 120 123 119 114 115 116
>> f6e23797-4ad2-b761-2a6d-97846c122d7e c=IN IP4 35.160.47.89
>> f6e23797-4ad2-b761-2a6d-97846c122d7e a=rtcp:9 IN IP4 0.0.0.0
>> f6e23797-4ad2-b761-2a6d-97846c122d7e a=candidate:1252570982 1 udp 2122260223 192.168.208.1 62060 typ host generation 0 network-id 1
>> f6e23797-4ad2-b761-2a6d-97846c122d7e a=candidate:854729925 1 udp 2122194687 172.20.4.169 62061 typ host generation 0 network-id 2 network-cost 10
>> f6e23797-4ad2-b761-2a6d-97846c122d7e a=candidate:69946262 1 tcp 1518280447 192.168.208.1 9 typ host tcptype active generation 0 network-id 1
>> f6e23797-4ad2-b761-2a6d-97846c122d7e a=candidate:2087835701 1 tcp 1518214911 172.20.4.169 9 typ host tcptype active generation 0 network-id 2 network-cost 10
>> f6e23797-4ad2-b761-2a6d-97846c122d7e a=candidate:3112167340 1 udp 25042943 35.jj.kk.mm <http://35.jj.kk.mm/> 13143 typ relay raddr 210.55.134.98 rport 53504 generation 0 network-id 2 network-cost 10
>> 
>> The relay was chosen for video, and it appeared that the same candidate was going to be chosen for audio, but then an "AUDIO RTP" suggests it chose a private IPv4. And it seems that private IPv4 wasn't treated as a peer-reflexive candidate, so the media couldn't be routed...
>> 
>> f6e23797-4ad2-b761-2a6d-97846c122d7e 2020-08-19 05:14:33.753568 [DEBUG] switch_core_media.c:4338 Choose rtp candidate, index 2, 35.jj.kk.mm:13143 <http://35.jj.kk.mm:13143/>
>> f6e23797-4ad2-b761-2a6d-97846c122d7e 2020-08-19 05:14:33.753568 [DEBUG] switch_core_media.c:4104 verto.rtc/1200_a6dd33a4-1def-447c-a62a-ae807bb92da6_v-1*s-4 choosing family v4
>> f6e23797-4ad2-b761-2a6d-97846c122d7e 2020-08-19 05:14:33.753568 [DEBUG] switch_core_media.c:4349 Choose same candidate, index 0, for rtcp based on rtcp-mux attribute 35.jj.kk.mm:13143 <http://35.jj.kk.mm:13143/>
>> f6e23797-4ad2-b761-2a6d-97846c122d7e 2020-08-19 05:14:33.753568 [DEBUG] switch_core_media.c:4401 setting remote video ice addr to index 2 35.jj.kk.mm:13143 <http://35.jj.kk.mm:13143/> based on candidate
>> f6e23797-4ad2-b761-2a6d-97846c122d7e 2020-08-19 05:14:33.753568 [DEBUG] switch_core_media.c:4436 Setting remote rtcp video addr to 35.jj.kk.mm:13143 <http://35.jj.kk.mm:13143/> based on candidate
>> f6e23797-4ad2-b761-2a6d-97846c122d7e 2020-08-19 05:14:33.753568 [DEBUG] switch_core_media.c:8663 AUDIO RTP [verto.rtc/1200_a6dd33a4-1def-447c-a62a-ae807bb92da6_v-1*s-4] 10.0.0.100 port 26610 -> 192.168.208.1 port 62058 codec: 111 ms: 20
>> 
>> Am I interpreting the log correctly?
>> 
>> Is there a way to avoid this?
>> 
>> Note that in /usr/local/freeswitch/conf/autoload_configs/acl.conf.xml we already deny private IPv4 (although I think we should allow them so they could be used peer-reflexively):
>>     <list name="disallow-privateIPv4" default="allow">
>>         <node type="deny" host="10.0.0.0" mask="255.0.0.0"/>
>>         <node type="deny" host="172.16.0.0" mask="255.240.0.0"/>
>>         <node type="deny" host="192.168.0.0" mask="255.255.0.0"/>
>>     </list>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20200827/d1f43429/attachment.html>