[Freeswitch-users] Docker or a traditional VM-based deployment?

[Jason Benedict Low]

Hello Flavio,
Since your use is light and simple, you can go with VM.
The company I work in, we use Virtual Server Instance (VSI) from IBM Cloud
(previously known as Softlayer). We ran freeswitch for an estimated 10
years already.
We had the simple configuration for the VSI:
===========
CPU core 4
RAM 8G
*Root Disk: 25GB SAN
**Extended Disk: 1TB SAN
===========

* is for running freeswitch,postgresql and nginx etc
* is for data and recording and etc.

Hope this helpful

Best Regards,
Jason

*** Reclaim Your Freedom, use Free & Open Source Software - Be Open
Standard Compliance. ***










On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 5:58 AM Flavio Donadio <flavio at donadio.com.br>
wrote:

> David, Sergey, Marcel and Sam,
>
>
> Thanks for your great input.
>
> The --network=host requirement is a showstopper for me, since I intended
> on using Azure’s Docker container hosting (to avoid getting a full VM). If
> I use that, I have no control of the host network parameters, since my
> container would be running in a host I can’t control.
>
> So, my best choice is a full VM… and study the possibility of having it
> scheduled to run only during business hours… Or maybe just let it run 24/7
> and see how much it costs. Based on the minimum requirements, I guess the
> lightest VMs are very capable of running FreeSWITCH.
>
> Marcel, thanks for your 2 cents — which are worth WAY more than that,
> especially the database tip.
>
>
> Regards,
> Flavio
>
>
> On 11 Aug 2020, at 11:15, David Villasmil <david.villasmil.work at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Well, you can configure the instance to shut down at say 8pm and start
> again at 8am or something like that
>
>
>
> On 11 Aug 2020, at 06:42, Sergey Safarov <s.safarov at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> you can use my docker image
> https://hub.docker.com/repository/docker/safarov/freeswitch
>
> here is Debina based image with vanilla config.
>
>
> On 11 Aug 2020, at 05:06, Sam van Herwaarden <
> svanherwaarden at precisionag.org> wrote:
>
> We use Docker throughout our stack, with the exception of FreeSWITCH. You
> can run FreeSWITCH in docker and I'm sure for some people it will have
> advantages. There are a few issues I ran into:
> - FreeSWITCH needs a very large number of open ports when using SIP
> (thousands). Docker is not designed for this and this is the reason people
> tell you to use host networking (that way you skip the docker port mapping
> system).
>
>
> On 11 Aug 2020, at 04:57, Marcel Haldemann <marcel.haldemann at convercom.ch>
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Just my 2 Cents about FreeSwtich and Docker if you are interested in
> learning about Docker and single-machine Orchestration:
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
>
> The FreeSWITCH project is sponsored by SignalWire https://signalwire.com
> Enhance your FreeSWITCH install with disruptive priced SMS and PSTN
> services.
> Build your next product on our scalable cloud platform.
>
> Join our online community to chat in real time
> https://signalwire.community
>
> Professional FreeSWITCH Services
> sales at freeswitch.com
> https://freeswitch.com
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> https://freeswitch.com/oss
> https://freeswitch.org/confluence
> https://cluecon.com
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> https://freeswitch.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20200826/69b7e149/attachment.html>