[Freeswitch-users] Call hold issue

[Mirko Brankovic]

I think this is a standard behaviour,
so sendonly party will receive MOH or silence if there is no moh and other
bridged side will still hear him

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:34 AM <igor.potjevlesch at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
>
>
> I have a weird behaviour with a call hold scenario. When the customer on
> leg A is placing the call on-hold (by sending a RE INVITE with sendonly
> attribute in the SDP), Freeswitch is switching to hold: "Callstate Change
> ACTIVE -> HELD". But only on the leg A.
>
> The holding is not forwarded  to the leg B. So, it causes the called party
> not to hear the Music On Hold generated by the calling party.
>
>
>
> Any idea of what could result in this behaviour?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Igor.
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Services
> sales at freeswitch.com
> https://freeswitch.com
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> https://freeswitch.com/oss
> https://freeswitch.org/confluence
> https://cluecon.com
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> https://freeswitch.com



-- 
Regards,
Mirko
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20190227/871f0b12/attachment.html>