[Freeswitch-users] Register to freeswitch with 2 IPs on the same interface

[Michael Jerris]

Those should match what the profile is binding to.

> On Nov 30, 2018, at 5:22 AM, Markus Bönke <mbodbg at gmx.net> wrote:
> 
> setting the switchname writes the value into sip_registrations.hostname, but in sip_registrations.server_host and sip_registration.orig_server_host is still the ip from eth1 .204. I’ve swapped the IPs, so .210 is now the main IP on eth1.  Now I see .210 in all fields.
> 
> Thanks and regards
> 
> Markus
>  
>> Am 29.11.2018 um 21:13 schrieb Michael Jerris <mike at jerris.com <mailto:mike at jerris.com>>:
>> 
>> https://freeswitch.org/stash/projects/FS/repos/freeswitch/browse/conf/vanilla/autoload_configs/switch.conf.xml#39 <https://freeswitch.org/stash/projects/FS/repos/freeswitch/browse/conf/vanilla/autoload_configs/switch.conf.xml#39>
>> 
>> 
>>> On Nov 29, 2018, at 8:39 AM, Markus Bönke <mbodbg at gmx.net <mailto:mbodbg at gmx.net>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hello all,
>>> 
>>> we have a server with 2 external IPs (eth1 .204 and eth1.1 .210 at the end). 
>>> The sip profile is listening on .210 and clients are sending REGISTER requests to .210. 
>>> But in table sip_registrations field hostname and orig_server_host there is the IP .204. 
>>> 
>>> Is there a setting to force freeswitch to store the IP where the REGISTER was sent to? 
>>> Or is there an issue when the IP is configured as second IP on the same interface?
>>> 
>>> Thanks and regards
>>> 
>>> Markus
>> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20181130/b5765977/attachment-0001.html>