[Freeswitch-users] Hiredis + limit_execute bridge ends up in hangup(-ERR)

[Alexandru Covalschi]

May be a bug... Now I switched to ODBC engine, that one works fine - but I don't get any transfer to limit_exceeded - still that hangup(-ERR). Anyone has any idea?

________________________________
Alexandru Covalschi
VoIP Engineer and System Administrator
tel: +373 673 98 493

> 30 янв. 2018 г., в 18:47, Alexandru Covalschi <568691 at gmail.com> написал(а):
> 
> Ok so now I've stopped freeswitches, deleted redis database, restarted redis, restarted freeswitches - and still have negative values in the database. What am I doing wrong?
> 
> ________________________________
> Alexandru Covalschi
> VoIP Engineer and System Administrator
> tel: +373 673 98 493
> 
>> 30 янв. 2018 г., в 18:18, Alexandru Covalschi <568691 at gmail.com <mailto:568691 at gmail.com>> написал(а):
>> 
>> Well, I think I know the issue
>> 127.0.0.1:6379> get 2_392_12791
>> "-9"
>> 
>> I suppose we need some mechanism to prevent values less than 0 being stored in redis...
>> ________________________________
>> Alexandru Covalschi
>> VoIP Engineer and System Administrator
>> tel: +373 673 98 493
>> 
>>> 30 янв. 2018 г., в 15:20, Alexandru Covalschi <568691 at gmail.com <mailto:568691 at gmail.com>> написал(а):
>>> 
>>> Hello list,
>>> 
>>> Recently I've changed limit_execute engine from hash to hiredis and it leaded to some weird floating bug.
>>> Sometimes I get  hangup(-ERR) with no further explanation, it doesn't occur each time, sometimes similar bridge can be fine, sometimes it results in  immediate hangup(-ERR) with no channel B created (invite is not even coming out). When I switch the limit_execute engine back to hash it works fine. 
>>> That occurs both on Centos 7 and Debian 8 machines, on Centos I have latest code from git branch v.1.6, on Debian - latest packages from FS repo.
>>> 
>>> Here's the log of the problematic place https://pastebin.com/AJG8S5Yx <https://pastebin.com/AJG8S5Yx> 
>>> If you need the full log please let me know.
>>> Redis benchmark showed that redis is working fine, I have only two machines per one redis-server, so it's not a socket or memory limit (but anyway I didn't check that yet, will do later today)
>>> 
>>> Thanks in advance
>>> 
>>> ________________________________
>>> Alexandru Covalschi
>>> VoIP Engineer and System Administrator
>>> tel: +373 673 98 493
>>> 
>> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20180131/3f60fd56/attachment.html>