[Freeswitch-users] FreeSWITCH behind NAT
jungle boogie
jungleboogie0 at gmail.com
Mon Jan 29 01:51:40 UTC 2018
Hi All,
I have some questions about this page and what folks do when freeswitch
is behind NAT:
https://freeswitch.org/confluence/display/FREESWITCH/NAT+Traversal
1. Do ports need to be opened on the firewall under all circumstances?
UDP ports for RTP, for instance.
2. Is this always a good idea to enable in sip_profiles/internal.xml?
<param name="nat-options-ping" value="true"/>
3. Is it necessary/recommended to have STUN enabled in vars.xml AND
setup the nat-options-ping?
4. my sip_profile/internal.xml has this:
<param name="ext-rtp-ip" value="auto-nat"/>
<param name="ext-sip-ip" value="auto-nat"/>
Is this an improvement over what's in confluence of:
<param name="ext-rtp-ip" value="$${external_rtp_ip}"/>
5. If the endpoints are configured to connect using TCP, does any of
this change what's above?
thanks!
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users
mailing list