[Freeswitch-users] CPU for FS boxes. High freq.? or more cores? or more cache?

[Giovanni Maruzzelli]

If I have to compromise, in your case I'd go with more cores.

-giovanni



On 24 January 2018 at 14:15, Adam Raszynski <netcentrica at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi
>
> I plan to buy some new servers to use as FreeSWITCH boxes
>
> Servers mainly bridge calls and proxy media from A to B. No special
> features, but they got a lot of traffic and customers require high quality
> of calls.
>
> What is the best practice in choosing CPU for FS boxes?
>
>
> I see different options:
>
> - high frequency (4GHz+) desktop CPU's like Intel i7 series
>
> - medium frequency Xeons/Opterons, but with large cache
>
> - low frequency Xeons/Opterons but with many cores
>
>
> Unfortunately I can't find reasonably priced CPU's that will have both
> high freq., many cores and large cache so need to pick what's the best
>
>
> What is most important performance-wise for low latency, high quality
> media bridging? More single core frequency? More cache? More cores?
>
> Kind Regards
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>



-- 

Sincerely,

Giovanni Maruzzelli
OpenTelecom.IT
cell: +39 347 266 56 18
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20180124/0bcabd97/attachment.html>