[Freeswitch-users] Noob question about xml dialplan

[Michael Jerris]

this is totally valid syntax.  It means parse that exact static file.

> On May 16, 2017, at 11:13 AM, David Villasmil <david.villasmil.work at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> No, you may be sending it to the right ports, but the profile attached to that port must have the context set to the correct dialplan.
> 
> I just did exactly what you're doing and i also got "No Route, Aborting"
> 
> I've never seen this type of "dialplan" value, tbh
> 
> <param name="dialplan" value="XML:/etc/freeswitch/dialplans/t38_transcode.xml"/>
> 
> 
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana <rbetancor at gmail.com <mailto:rbetancor at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Only one profile defined on the sofia.conf.xml and I'm sending the traffict to the wright ports, if not I whould get the logs on the console, as that are the only ports enabled.
> 
> 2017-05-16 14:22 GMT+01:00 David Villasmil <david.villasmil.work at gmail.com <mailto:david.villasmil.work at gmail.com>>:
> Take a look at your profile, it should be listening on the port you're sending to, and must have the context parameter set to your dialplan name.
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 3:15 PM Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana <rbetancor at gmail.com <mailto:rbetancor at gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> Hi all, till now I'm been working with pre-made setup files for FS, and now I'm trying to get a deep knowleadge of how the dialplan works.
> 
> So I modifed my autoload_configs/sofia.conf.xml file and changed my dialplan param to something like this:
> 
> <param name="dialplan" value="XML:/etc/freeswitch/dialplans/t38_transcode.xml,inline:socket:127.0.0.1:8022 <http://127.0.0.1:8022/> async full"/>
> 
> The Idea is that it loads another .xml file especific task and also use a dialplan throught a socket to a daemon that handle the rest.
> 
> On my t38_transcode.xml file ... very simple:
> 
> <extension name="t38_transcode">
>  <condition field="sip_h_X-T38-Transcode" expresion="^True"/>
>  <condition field="destination_number" expresion="^(\+1|1)?([2-9]\d\d[2-9]\d{6})$"> 
>    <action application="set" data="fax_enable_t38=true"/> 
>    <action application="set" data="t38_trace=true"/> 
>    <action application="set" data="sip_execute_on_image=t38_gateway peer nocng"/>     
>    <action application="bridge" data="sofia/external/$1$2 at proxy.server.tld"/> 
>  </condition> 
> </extension>
> 
> But If I fire a call to FS like [number]@[FS_IP] from a sip testing client I get
> 
> [INFO] switch_core_state_machine.c:311 No Route, Aborting
> 
> What I'm doing wrong here?
> 
> My target its just I want to ANY call that came in with a SIP header of X-T39-Transcode=True (market by a sip proxy elsewhere on the net) just do a T38->Ulaw transcoding saving the T38 trace, so I could inspect it later.
> The rest of calls coming in ... as they don't have the sip-header should end on other app.
> 
> For doing the testing I disabled the socket_inline part of the dialplan string, so it have only this:
> 
> <param name="dialplan" value="XML:/etc/freeswitch/dialplans/t38_transcode.xml"/>
> 
> Did I miss something? ... or maybe missundestood who the xml dialplan works ?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20170516/08a3d02d/attachment.html