[Freeswitch-users] shared memory pools

[Michael Jerris]

We have no plans to make major changes in this space.

> On Jan 17, 2017, at 8:10 AM, Sergey Safarov <s.safarov at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> This questions for FS core developers.
> I found that FreeSwitch apr libs have apr_pool_mutex_set that not exists in APR master.
> I found commit <https://freeswitch.org/stash/projects/FS/repos/freeswitch/commits/ffb1cb4f690473af696fe1fe3879790fe49acecb> where this function is introduced.
> Purpose of this commit is resolve concurrency access from different threads to same memory pool.
> 
> I asked <http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/apr-dev/201701.mbox/%3CCAHtxdDfDwmoACnYn04FTWWgtpK8giJjsgSgg5VvuSN%2Bph4G%3DBw%40mail.gmail.com%3E> APR community why not used mutex and got responce from William A Rowe <http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/apr-dev/201701.mbox/%3CCACsi2539CFJusRo0wmReEEdrdG5ppJsJb-C9aD-g7K6tFos%2BOA%40mail.gmail.com%3E>
> 
> My questions
> Does core team developers planning rewrite memory pool operation to remove shared access to same pool from different threads? Create own pool for each thread.
> 
> Sergey
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services: 
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
> 
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
> 
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20170117/be2e37fb/attachment.html