[Freeswitch-users] TURN Configuration under CGN (RFC6598)

[Michael Jerris]

is that OPTIMA-TELEKOM

if so, that is their ip block…

> On Aug 2, 2017, at 2:27 AM, Tihomir Culjaga <tculjaga at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> another carrier is using  :=)
> 89.201.184.0
> 89.201.185.0
> 89.201.186.0
> 89.201.187.0
> 
> this is just wrong ... :=)
> 
> 
> 
> On 1 August 2017 at 22:01, Tihomir Culjaga <tculjaga at gmail.com <mailto:tculjaga at gmail.com>> wrote:
> some private segment....10.x.x.x something on some carriers and 172.31.x.x on others
> 
> no idea about others
> 
> On 1 August 2017 at 14:26, Brian West <brian at freeswitch.org <mailto:brian at freeswitch.org>> wrote:
> What IP range did they use for CGNAT?
> 
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 9:23 PM Nandy Dagondon <nandy1925 at gmail.com <mailto:nandy1925 at gmail.com>> wrote:
> My Internet provider just implemented CGN. So, my WAN IP is no longer public.  With CGN, NAT is setup for outbound packets initiated from my end.  But for inbound packets, when remote Vertp clients connect to my FS, CGN blocks them. Therefore, I can no longer experiment with Verto.  
> 
> That's why I need to try TURN/ICE service which is open to public to relay media to my FS.  I understand STUN can only help in signalling.
> 
> Thanks for the additional inputs.
> 
> /Nandy
> 
> 
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Tihomir Culjaga <tculjaga at gmail.com <mailto:tculjaga at gmail.com>> wrote:
> TURN helps in Symmetric NAT scenarios only
> 
> you should always try to get a direct connection first ( using STUN ) and if everything else fails, you can use TURN.
> 
> to check your NAT type, you can use stunclient program from stunprotocol.org <http://stunprotocol.org/>
> 
> e.g.:  /stunclient --mode full stun.ekiga.net <http://stun.ekiga.net/> 3479
> 
> On 31 July 2017 at 02:44, Brian West <brian at freeswitch.org <mailto:brian at freeswitch.org>> wrote:
> What issue are you trying to solve with turn? 
> 
> On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 1:42 AM Tihomir Culjaga <tculjaga at gmail.com <mailto:tculjaga at gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
> FS doesn't use turn... but verto client can use it if you pass the parameter in init function ... like that:
> 
>    iceServers: [
>       {url: 'turn:numb.viagenie.ca <http://numb.viagenie.ca/>',credential: 'pass', username: 'user'},
>       {url: 'stun:ripslinger.undo.it <http://ripslinger.undo.it/>',},
>       {url: 'stun:stun.schlund.de <http://stun.schlund.de/>',},
>       {url: 'stun:stun.ekiga.net <http://stun.ekiga.net/>',},
>       {url: 'stun:stun01.sipphone.com <http://stun01.sipphone.com/>',},
>    ],
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 28 July 2017 at 15:54, Brian West <brian at freeswitch.org <mailto:brian at freeswitch.org>> wrote:
> TURN is not needed with FreeSWITCH, plus we do not support it.
> 
> /b
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 8:55 PM, Nandy Dagondon <nandy1925 at gmail.com <mailto:nandy1925 at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hi folks,
> 
> I just learned that our Internet provider implemented CGN when I'm about to experiment WebRTC/mod_verto.  I already signed up a free TURN server account at http://numb.viagenie.ca/ <http://numb.viagenie.ca/> to proceed.   Where do I place turn:numb.viagenie.ca <http://numb.viagenie.ca/> in the config files? Is this correct?
> 
> sip_profiles/external.xml:
> <param name="ext-rtp-ip" value="turn:numb.viagenie.ca <http://numb.viagenie.ca/>"/>
> <param name="ext-sip-ip" value="turn:numb.viagenie.ca <http://numb.viagenie.ca/>"/>
> 
> /Nandy

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20170802/b4938a35/attachment.html>