[Freeswitch-users] Transfer in a Conference

[Colin Morelli]

Thanks for the reply.

3 was just the example. In practice it could be 4, 5, or 10. Though even if
it were 3, I'm fairly sure I couldn't get the recording that I want.
Without a conference I have to record sessions, but I want the recording to
continue for as long as there conference is active, regardless of who's
still in it (if 1 initiates the call and leaves, the recording should
continue until 2 and 3 leave).

To be clear, I only actually care to support transfer when there are 2
people in the conference. Effectively it would be treating a 2 person
conference as if it were a bridge.

Best,
Colin
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 7:46 PM Abaci B <abaci64 at gmail.com> wrote:

> not sure your exact use case but in the scenario you described maybe the
> three_way
> <https://freeswitch.org/confluence/display/FREESWITCH/mod_dptools:+three_way>
> application can be used for #3 to join instead of conference?
>
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 7:22 PM, Colin Morelli <colin.morelli at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hey again,
>>
>> From looking through the source (and some light experimenting), it looks
>> like blind transfers don't work unless the call is bridged. This means they
>> don't work in a conference. That makes sense (the behavior would be
>> undefined).
>>
>> However, I have a case in which I want this behavior, and am looking to
>> see if anyone has done anything similar. Say two people join a call
>> together, then a third gets added. When the third is added, all
>> participants are moved into a conference. Now, #3 drops off, and it's just
>> 1 and 2 again.
>>
>> It doesn't seem like there's any straight forward way of allowing 1/2 to
>> initiate blind transfers, is that right? Has anyone else encountered this
>> issue? Should I just be dynamically pulling people out of and adding them
>> back into conferences in this case?
>>
>> Ideally, there'd be a way to specify conference transfer behavior such
>> that when in a conference, blind transfers can still work so long as there
>> are exactly two people in that conference. Would this be a welcome addition?
>>
>> Best,
>> Colin
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________________
>> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
>> consulting at freeswitch.org
>> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>>
>> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
>> http://www.cluecon.com
>>
>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20160913/fa793863/attachment-0001.html