[Freeswitch-users] FreeSwitch & Simulcast

[Mirko Brankovic]

Good point, thanks :)

On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Michael Jerris <mike at jerris.com> wrote:

> Currently there are lots of good tools to do SFU, I’m not sure what the
> upside is to us doing SFU as well that is not already covered by other
> tools.  Its a similar discussion to people who want FS to be a proxy.  If
> there is sufficient demand and funding to do the work, we would consider
> it.  Lacking the funding to do this work I don’t see the drive to do it.
>
>
> On Oct 3, 2016, at 10:45 AM, Mirko Brankovic <mirkobrankovic at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I'm wondering where do FS stands now and what is the plan for future?
>
> I saw there were PlanB
> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-uberti-rtcweb-plan-00> and Unified Plan
> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-roach-mmusic-unified-plan-00> but I
> guess none passed the point of proposal I guess.
>
> Now I see some different "webrtc standards" as *rid* in sdp
> <https://webrtcstandards.info/simulcast-and-sending-multiple-video-resolutions-to-the-sfu/>
> .
>
> Simulcast is the future I guess, like it or not i guess.
>
> My general question is will FS go in SFU direction and why not  ??? :D
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>



-- 
Regards,
Mirko
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20161004/c03acc74/attachment.html