[Freeswitch-users] unrelayed BYE

[Mirko Brankovic]

You need to follow the whole sip flow, maybe you are missing another Via
header, or the tag or branch is incorrect....

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 8:42 AM, David Villasmil <
david.villasmil.work at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello guys,
>
> I have this situation where the whole call goes well, except the BYE.
> Freeswitch receives the BYE, but doesn't relay it, and I can't figure out
> why, here's a trace:
>
> recv 489 bytes from udp/[196.207.243.108]:5080 at 07:22:05.626643:
>    -----------------------------------------------------------
> -------------
>    BYE sip:gw+gw_108 at 196.207.243.245:5080;transport=udp;gw=gw_108 SIP/2.0
>    Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 196.207.243.108:5080;branch=z9hG4bK2e5f9502;rport
>    Max-Forwards: 70
>    From: <sip:774720380 at 196.207.243.108:5080>;tag=as6c7e3a9d
>    To: "721102372" <sip:721102372 at 196.207.243.245>;tag=a9B2UttKm9Nyg
>    Call-ID: 16336d2d-1d02-1235-8693-0026b955dc81
>    CSeq: 102 BYE
>    User-Agent: Asterisk PBX 11.23.0
>    X-Asterisk-HangupCause: Unallocated (unassigned) number
>    X-Asterisk-HangupCauseCode: 1
>    Content-Length: 0
>
>    -----------------------------------------------------------
> -------------
> tport.c:3023 tport_deliver() tport_deliver(0x7f5a04004540): msg
> 0x7f5a04007eb0 (489 bytes) from udp/196.207.243.108:5080/sip next=(nil)
> nta.c:2880 agent_recv_request() nta: received BYE
> sip:gw+gw_108 at 196.207.243.245:5080;transport=udp;gw=gw_108 SIP/2.0 (CSeq
> 102)
> nta.c:3248 agent_aliases() nta: canonizing sip:gw+gw_108 at 196.207.243.245:
> 5080 with contact
> nta.c:3060 agent_recv_request() nta: BYE (102) going to existing leg
> nua_server.c:102 nua_stack_process_request() nua:
> nua_stack_process_request: entering
> nua_stack.c:359 nua_application_event() nua: nua_application_event:
> entering
> nua.c:366 nua_handle_magic() nua: nua_handle_magic: entering
> nua.c:879 nua_respond() nua: nua_respond: entering
> nua_stack.c:529 nua_signal() nua(0x7f599c000d40): sent signal r_respond
> nua.c:342 nua_handle_bind() nua: nua_handle_bind: entering
> nua.c:921 nua_handle_destroy() nua: nua_handle_destroy: entering
> nua_stack.c:529 nua_signal() nua(0x7f599c000d40): sent signal r_destroy
> nua_params.c:480 nua_stack_set_params() nua: nua_stack_set_params: entering
> soa.c:403 soa_set_params() soa_set_params(static::0x7f5a04014610, ...)
> called
> tport.c:3257 tport_tsend() tport_tsend(0x7f5a04004540) tpn = UDP/
> 196.207.243.108:5080
> tport.c:4046 tport_resolve() tport_resolve addrinfo = 196.207.243.108:5080
> tport.c:4680 tport_by_addrinfo() tport_by_addrinfo(0x7f5a04004540): not
> found by name UDP/196.207.243.108:5080
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks
> ᐧ
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
>



-- 
Regards,
Mirko
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20161104/63698d97/attachment.html