[Freeswitch-users] Verto client on different server than freeswitch

[Michael Jerris]

Like sip over websockets, calls back to a registered verto endpoint must be
done on the server that receives the registration as it must be made over
the open websockets.

On Monday, March 28, 2016, Rutu Patel <rutu.patel at inextrix.com> wrote:

> Hi Bote,
>
> Is there any way to share verto registration as we can do with SIP
> registrations ?
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Rutu Patel
>
> <http://www.inextrix.com>
>
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Bote Man <bote_radio at botecomm.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','bote_radio at botecomm.com');>> wrote:
>
>> As Verto is not SIP, would Verto registrations even appear in the
>> sip_registration table?
>>
>>
>>
>> Perhaps you are using or looking in the wrong table?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Bote
>>
>> FreeSWITCH Docs Janitor
>>
>> http://freeswitch.org/confluence
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Rutu Patel
>> *Sent:* Monday, 28 March, 2016 03:06
>> *Subject:* Re: [Freeswitch-users] Verto client on different server than
>> freeswitch
>>
>>
>>
>> Can anyone please assist for shared connection of verto users ?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>> Rutu Patel
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Rutu Patel <rutu.patel at inextrix.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','rutu.patel at inextrix.com');>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Gregor,
>>
>> Thanks for quick reply.
>>
>> We have sip_registration table for shared database between two freeswitch
>> servers.
>>
>> But there is no entry of registered verto user in that table.
>>
>> We have two freeswitch servers 192.168.1.10 and 192.168.1.11.
>>
>> Now if we register one user(1000) on .10 and run
>>
>> freeswitch at internal> verto_contact 1000 at 192.168.1.10
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','1000 at 192.168.1.10');>
>> freeswitch at internal> verto.rtc/u:74a87202-c5cc-88ad-c6b7-593dbd7s4w8g
>>
>> it shows as registered.
>>
>> But when we run same command on .11 it says error/user_not_registered.We
>> want to share the registration between two freeswitch.
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>> Rutu Patel
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Gregor Nanger <gregor at infomedia.si
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gregor at infomedia.si');>> wrote:
>>
>> We are using using xml_curl for sharing registrations and it works also
>> with mod_verto.
>>
>> I think it should also work in your scenario. Registration is
>> registration, it doesn't matter where it comes.
>>
>> Do you have problems with your scenario?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 26, 2016, 06:46 Rutu Patel <rutu.patel at inextrix.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','rutu.patel at inextrix.com');>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We are using 2 freeswitch servers with mod_verto implemented.
>>
>>
>> We have web client verto demo on different server than freeswitch server.
>>
>> For sofia registrations we use shared database using odbc connection.
>>
>>
>>
>> Is it possible to use shared database concept with verto registration or
>> is there any other way to achieve  this ?
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>> Rutu Patel
>>
>>
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________________
>> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
>> consulting at freeswitch.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','consulting at freeswitch.org');>
>> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>>
>> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
>> http://www.cluecon.com
>>
>> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
>> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org');>
>> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
>> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
>> http://www.freeswitch.org
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20160328/71286d3c/attachment-0001.html