[Freeswitch-users] Does freeswitch forks his processes?
Peter Steinbach
lists at telefaks.de
Tue Feb 2 18:10:54 MSK 2016
I've just stumpled over this:
>Is FreeSWITCH starting with root permissions? It needs this in order to
use the FIFO scheduler and access realtime threads. If not started as
root, this would explain your CPS limitations.
We like to run Freeswitch as a non privileged user, due to security
concerns. So there are drawbacks here compared to running FS as root?
Can we somehow quantify the differences?
Best regards
Peter
On 02/02/16 13:58, Bote Man wrote:
>
> Is FreeSWITCH starting with root permissions? It needs this in order
> to use the FIFO scheduler and access realtime threads. If not started
> as root, this would explain your CPS limitations. There are also
> limits that can be set in the config files.
>
>
>
> After it starts it drops privileges to those specified on the command
> line with --u and --g switches.
>
>
>
> FreeSWITCH uses multi-threading. I do not know about htop, but maybe
> it is showing the multiple threads?
>
>
>
> top --H shows each thread.
>
>
>
> ---
>
> Bote
>
> FreeSWITCH Docs Janitor
>
> http://freeswitch.org/confluence
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:*Vladislav Ivanov
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 02 February, 2016 07:09
> *Subject:* [Freeswitch-users] Does freeswitch forks his processes?
>
>
>
> Hey guys,
>
> I have a question about freeswitch process/threading usage.
> So far that I haven't noticed freeswitch to fork himself, I have only
> 1 freeswitch instance.
> http://i.imgur.com/bdbYOwp.png
>
> But then I found screenshot of htop with freeswitch and noticed that
> there is multiple freeswitch processes being run:
> http://i.imgur.com/VNpl55z.jpg
>
> I'm having issues with "loading" the freeswitch after 50 cps in any
> cpu/ram configuration.
> Be it physical or virtual environment I cant pass the 50 cps mark.
> I have strange issue with CPU usage on same CPS:
>
> http://i.imgur.com/8BdQWVL.png
> http://i.imgur.com/mWRnoGr.png
>
> I timeload test freeswitch with 50cps for 5+ hours, and seems like
> there is some kind of leak somewhere.
> I have tested configuration on:
> Debian 8
> 2 core/8 gb ram
> 4 core/8 gb ram (graphs are from here)
> 8 core/32 gb ram
>
> and in all the tests I were not able to send more than 50 cps without
> CPU dropping to 0 with all system starting to respond really laggy.
>
> Test is:
> sipp -> freeswitch -> sipp
>
> Just 1 dialpeer with bridge action. No gateways. Just simple dialplan
> and 1 profile...
> Any advice?
>
> Thank you all
>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Professional FreeSWITCH Consulting Services:
> consulting at freeswitch.org
> http://www.freeswitchsolutions.com
>
> Official FreeSWITCH Sites
> http://www.freeswitch.org
> http://confluence.freeswitch.org
> http://www.cluecon.com
>
> FreeSWITCH-users mailing list
> FreeSWITCH-users at lists.freeswitch.org
> http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/freeswitch-users
> UNSUBSCRIBE:http://lists.freeswitch.org/mailman/options/freeswitch-users
> http://www.freeswitch.org
--
With kind regards
Peter Steinbach
Telefaks Services GmbH
mailto:lists (att) telefaks.de
Internet: www.telefaks.de
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/attachments/20160202/08c37267/attachment.html
Join us at ClueCon 2016 Aug 8-12, 2016
More information about the FreeSWITCH-users
mailing list